Legal Opinion

Fentress v. Triple Mining, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 25, 1994No. 4-93-1000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

Plaintiff Forrest Fentress, d/b/a Fentress Trucking Company (Fentress), brought an action against defendants, Triple Mining, Inc., and its three officers and incorporators John T. Henry, George Dolly, and Carl S. Bachtold to recover $10,000 plus interest for a promissory note executed by Bachtold as an officer of Triple Mining payable to Fentress. Carl S. Bachtold was later dismissed from the suit. Following a bench trial, the circuit court entered a judgment in favor of Fentress against all remaining defendants, finding them jointly and severally liable in the amount of $21,778.28.

Defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Carroll v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Tassan v. United Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People Ex Rel. Scott v. PintozziIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Gallagher v. Reconco Builders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Berlinger's, Inc. v. Beef's Finest, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of Illinois, Inc. v. Richard Ter MaatCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Laborer's Pension Fund v. Lay-Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Michael Brandon v. Anesthesia & Pain Management Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Glass v. Kemper Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Brandon, Michael v. Anesthesia & PainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API