Legal Opinion

Lochner v. Silver Sales Service, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1950No. 527PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.

The motion of the defendant for a compulsory nonsuit challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. Graham v. Gas Co., 231 N.C. 680, 58 S.E. 2d 757.

The defendant insists initially that the action ought to have been non-suited for lack of evidence that Bernard A. Mollen, the manager of its business at Charlotte, had any authority to bind it to pay the plaintiff “for his services at the rate of $5,000.00 per year.”

The sole evidence at the trial relating to the power conferred directly upon Mollen by defendant to fix the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Croom v. Goldsboro Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Aydlett v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Durant v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Croom v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Allgood v. Wilmington Savings & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Nello L. Teer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Strickland v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API