Legal Opinion
Hymes v. Deramus
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 2005No. S-11562PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se plaintiffs Donald and Rita Hymes sued medical personnel associated with the Alaska Department of Corrections. After the defendants moved for summary judgment and supported their motion with a physician's affidavit, the superior court entered summary judgment against the Hymeses, who submitted no responsive affidavit. The Hymeses argue here that it was error to give them only an additional month in which to submit a responsive expert affidavit We agree, and reverse.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Donald Hymes is a federal prisoner who was temporarily…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D., William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- William Raymond Klingele v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry Amos Reed Larry Kincheloe Tana Wood Mr. Gleason James Thatcher Mr. McCleanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Jon Liebsack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Peterson v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Wright v. AndingAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.