Pellissier v. Corker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This action is brought for a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing an alleged alleyway situated between the respective lots of land of the parties. The relief prayed for was granted, and this appeal is prosecuted from such judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial. Defendant claims title in fee to the land covered by the alleged alley or way, and bases her right to obstruct the same as grantee of one Rhinehart under a certain deed made to him by one Winbigler, the original owner of the entire tract. At the date of this deed he held the title in fee to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eldridge v. See Yup Co.California Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Cooper v. SeligCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.