Jewell v. Welch
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Case by George E. Jewell against Patrick Welch, a saloon keeper, and Herbert Babcock and Andrew Haberstumpf, his bondsmen, under the civil-damage act. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action is brought against the defendant Welch and his bondsmen to recover damages for selling liquor to the plaintiff’s minor son, Glenn Jewell. The declaration counts on sales on the 7th of January, 1896, on the 1st of July, 1895, and on divers other days and dates, too numerous to mention, since May 1, 1895. The defense showed on the trial that the plaintiff had previously brought an action against one Andrew Flegler and his bondsmen, counting on sales of liquor to his son on the 1st of‘May, 1895, on the 7th of January, *661896, and on divers other days and dates; and further showed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aldrich v. ParnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Franklin v. FreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Jewett v. WanshuraSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Johnson v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larabell v. SchuknechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Charles E. Bowles, Jr. v. Zimmer Manufacturing Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Merrinane v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908