Legal Opinion

M.E.F. Builders, Inc. v. Siegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 11, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a *534determination of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead dated November 30, 1988, which, after hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for area and sideyard variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), dated June 5, 1989, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted to the extent of annulling the determination under review, and the matter is remitted to the respondent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Mackay v. MayhallNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Modular Homes Corp. v. CombsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. McDermott v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Khan v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Ewers v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Pateman v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Pironi v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API