Legal Opinion
Pironi v. Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead dated February 7, 1989, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s applications for area variances, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), entered May 23, 1990, which dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
*741The petitioner applied for certain area variances on his Hempstead property, the westerly portion of which is zoned "business” and the easterly portion of which is zoned…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Conley v. Town of Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kransteuber v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Siciliano v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Barrett v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sakrel, Ltd. v. RothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Meadow v. MansiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001