Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, dated September 8, 1987, which denied the petitioner’s applications for variances in area, width, front and rear yard setback requirements, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated January 5, 1988, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the petition is granted to the extent of annulling the determination in question and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barretto v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Bexson v. Board of Zoning & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. Dittmer v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Richards v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Mackay v. MayhallNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Siciliano v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Cicenia v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Matherson v. ScheyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. M.E.F. Builders, Inc. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Morin v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API