Legal Opinion

Tupper v. Hancock

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 1946PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The question here is whether the appellees Stanton and Mitchell are barred from participating in a distribution made in the estate of Francis C. Adams by • reason of releases given by them to the administrator of the estate. The judge of probate entered a decree that they were not barred, and the case comes here on the appeal of the executors of the late Thurber C. Adams, a creditor and one of the next of kin of Francis C. Adams. The judge made no finding of material facts, but there was a report *106of the evidence. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 215, § 12. The relevant facts disclosed by the evidence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Willett v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Radovsky v. WexlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Barrell v. BrittonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Gold v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Balles v. Babcock Power Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. ITT Corp. v. LTX Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Glass v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Pemrock, Inc. v. Essco Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API