Legal Opinion

Howe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1947No. A-10720PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, P. J.

We have re-examined the record and briefs on rehearing of this case.

It is strenuously insisted by the plaintiff in error that it was error to hold that an automobile could be lawfully searched under the terms of Tit. 37 O. S. 1941 § 84; and that a search warrant should have been issued under the general search warrant statute, Tit. 22 O. S. 1941 § 1221.

As stated in the original opinion [84 Okla. Cr. 279, 181 P. 2d 571]:

“We have often held that the search of an automobile was proper under the terms of this statute.” Tit. 37 O. S. 1941 § 84; White v. State, 33 Okla. Cr. 428, 244 P. 450; Fowler…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  2. Boardwine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Bowdry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Hoskins v. State Ex Rel. CrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Hatley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  2. Steward v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API