Legal Opinion

Boyd v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1923No. 2038PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The issue is whether, under the circumstances, evidence of the finding of intoxicating- liquors in an automobile without a warrant by a federal prohibition officer should have been excluded in the trial of the defendant on a charge of illegally transporting intoxicating liquors.

There is high authority for the proposition that the person in possession of forfeited property has no right to the protection of his possession, and that the property is always rightfully subject to seizure on behalf of the government. United States v. Stowell, 133 U. S. 19, 10 Sup. Ct. 244, 33 L.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Elrod v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
  5. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Garske v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. The People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Heyward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  5. Bass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API