Legal Opinion
Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 25, 2008No. Civ. S:94-cv-671 LKK/GGHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
On February 25, 2008, the Special Master filed his report and recommendations regarding the use of hearsay evidence in parole revocation proceedings. See Permanent Injunction, at -. The defendants have filed objections to the Special Master’s report; the plaintiffs encourage the court to adopt it, with modification. The court declines both parties’ requests and adopts the Special Master’s report and recommendations.
Despite defendants’ objections, the court agrees with the Special Master’s interpretation of United States v. Comito, 177 F.3d 1166…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- People v. StanphillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Anthony KebodeauxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011