Legal Opinion

People v. Stanphill

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 2009No. C056038PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Defendant Brenton Clay Stanphill appeals from a judgment following revocation of probation (Pen. Code, § 1203.2) upon the trial court’s finding that he participated in a gang-related battery (Pen. Code, §§ 242, 186.22) while incarcerated in jail as a condition of probation. The only evidence tying defendant to the battery was an unsworn hearsay statement of the victim to a law enforcement officer, identifying defendant’s photograph as portraying one of the assailants, which the court allowed as a spontaneous statement under Evidence Code section 1240. Defendant…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. PoggiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. UrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. State v. GuthrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. Cortez CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Crawley CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. Duran CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API