United States v. Guillermo Alamos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Guillermo E. Alamos was convicted of illegal reentry, 8 U.S.C. § 1826, and challenges the district court’s application of a 16-level sentencing enhancement based on a prior drug trafficking conviction, as well as the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Reviewing the district court’s analysis of the prior drug conviction de novo, United States v. Laurico-Yeno, 590 F.3d 818, 820 (9th Cir.2010), and the sub stantive reasonableness of its sentencing decision for abuse of discretion, United States v. Vasquez-Perez, 742 F.3d 896, 901 (9th Cir.2014), we affirm.
1. Alamos first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Amezcua-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Laurico-YenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cabantac v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.