Legal Opinion

United States v. Guillermo Alamos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2014No. 12-50382Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Guillermo E. Alamos was convicted of illegal reentry, 8 U.S.C. § 1826, and challenges the district court’s application of a 16-level sentencing enhancement based on a prior drug trafficking conviction, as well as the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Reviewing the district court’s analysis of the prior drug conviction de novo, United States v. Laurico-Yeno, 590 F.3d 818, 820 (9th Cir.2010), and the sub stantive reasonableness of its sentencing decision for abuse of discretion, United States v. Vasquez-Perez, 742 F.3d 896, 901 (9th Cir.2014), we affirm.

1. Alamos first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Amezcua-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Laurico-YenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Cabantac v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API