Cabantac v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 23, 2012, and appearing at 693 F.3d 825, is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 9632, 693 F.3d at 827, replace < Finally, it bears emphasizing that the amended abstract does not necessarily establish that Cabantac pleaded guilty only to the general state offenses with <The amended abstract is not properly before this court because it was not part of the administrative record on which the order of removal is based. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(A) (“[T]he court of appeals shall decide the petition only on the administrative record on which the order of removal…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jose Medina-Lara v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Miguel De La Torre-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Duenas-Alvarez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Raul Quijada Coronado v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.