Legal Opinion
United States v. Laurico-Yeno
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2010No. 09-50093PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOLLOY, District Judge:
Appellant Mark Laurico-Yeno (“Laurieo”) pleaded guilty to one count of being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). At sentencing, he received a sixteen-point increase in his base offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 after the sentencing judge determined his prior conviction of Inflicting Corporal Injury on Spouse/Cohabitant Partner in violation of California Penal Code § 273.5 (“ § 273.5”) was a “crime of violence.” He now appeals this sixteen-point increase arguing that § 273.5 is not a categorical “crime of violence.”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Jorge Valdavinos-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ruben Ceron v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Ayala-NicanorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Ruiz-ApolonioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Banuelos-Ayon v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.