Fields v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.
Appellant was charged with and convicted of aggravated robbery. During the punishment phase, the State presented evidence that appellant had committed a previous robbery which had never been prosecuted. In its charge at the punishment phase, the trial court instructed the jury that any extraneous evidence must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before it could be considered by the jury as a factor affecting punishment. The charge did not include a definition of the term “reasonable doubt,” although that term had been defined for the jury at guilt-innocence. Appellant did not object to…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fields v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
4Cited by146 opinions
- Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- In re C.J.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Cate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.