Legal Opinion

Fields v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 15, 1999No. 792-98PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.

Appellant was charged with and convicted of aggravated robbery. During the punishment phase, the State presented evidence that appellant had committed a previous robbery which had never been prosecuted. In its charge at the punishment phase, the trial court instructed the jury that any extraneous evidence must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt before it could be considered by the jury as a factor affecting punishment. The charge did not include a definition of the term “reasonable doubt,” although that term had been defined for the jury at guilt-innocence. Appellant did not object to…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fields v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

4Cited by146 opinions

  1. Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Huizar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. In re C.J.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Cate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API