Legal Opinion

Brown v. Capanna

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1989No. 19047PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this case of alleged medical negligence and lack of informed consent, the district court properly found that the negligence counts were barred by res judicata. However, the district court abused its discretion by excluding expert testimony that would have allowed appellants Adelaide Brown and Pat Johnson, the daughters of deceased Sophie Stokmans, to prove their prima facie case of failure to acquire informed consent. Based on Brown and Johnson’s inability to prove their prima facie case, the court directed a verdict for respondent Dr. Albert Capanna. We reverse and remand.

Facts

In…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Jackson v. HayakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. People v. WhitfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Orcutt v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Levine v. RemolifNevada Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by21 opinions

  1. Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. ArnoultNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hallmark v. EldridgeNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Banks Ex Rel. Banks v. Sunrise Hosp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Staccato v. Valley HospitalNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Turnbow v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API