Hage v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on the State of Nevada’s and various environmental groups’ motion to intervene pursuant to RCFC 24(a) and (b). Previously the court orally denied the motion to intervene but granted the applicants amici curiae status. This written opinion is issued because the court believes it may be useful in this case and to the bar generally to outline the extent of participation permitted by amici and to explain the reason for denial of the applicants’ motion.
FACTS
E. Wayne & Jean N. Hage filed this suit alleging constitutional, contractual and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- United States v. American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers of the National Ass'n of RealtorsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Karuk Tribe of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- American Maritime Transport, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wolfchild v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Anderson Columbia Environmental, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.