Legal Opinion
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 2, 2004No. 02-509LPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
The court has before it The Metamora Group’s Motion to Intervene. The members of the Metamora Group (intervenor-appli-cants) seek to intervene as party defendants. Memorandum in Support of the Metamora Group’s Motion to Intervene (Metamora Mem.) at 14. For the following reasons, The Metamora Group’s Motion to Intervene is DENIED.
I. Background1
In this case plaintiff John R. Sand & Gravel Company seeks compensation for defendant’s physical taking of plaintiffs property during the environmental remediation of the Metamora Landfill in Lapeer County, Michigan. Complaint…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Rosenshein v. KlebanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- DSMC, INC. v. Convera Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Fisherman's Harvest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.