Legal Opinion
Gregory Michael Hawes v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 2016No. S-15-0185, S-15-0191, S-15-0192PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Chief Justice.
[T1] Gregory Michael Hawes challenges the district court's denial of his two motions to correct an illegal sentence, and the denial of his motion to have counsel appointed to represent him in this appeal. We affirm.
ISSUES
[12] Mr. Hawes presents various arguments as separate issues, but there are two key questions to be answered in this appeal:
1. Did the district court err in denying Mr. Hawes' motions to correct an illegal sentence? |
2. Did the district court err in denying Mr. Hawes' motion for appointment of counsel to represent him in this ap- . peal?
FACTS
[18] Mr,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Thomas Reid DecarloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Cook v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goetzel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Volpi v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Steven R. Barela v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Town of Pine Bluffs v. EiseleWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Ronald Dale Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016