State v. Mathis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
Neither Article 3A of Chapter 148 of the General Statutes, which is relied upon by the defendant upon this appeal, now repealed but in effect at the time the defendant Was sentenced, nor its successor, Article 3B, in effect since 1 October 1977, has any application' to the present case, and there is no merit in the defendant’s contention that the trial judge should have followed the procedure set forth therein when he sentenced this defendant. State v. Niccum, 293 N.C. 276, 238 S.E. 2d 141 (1977). Speaking through the Chief Justice, we there said, “We hold that neither Article…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. . PottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MilanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HensleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.