Legal Opinion
Montez v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 3, 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s cause of action for false arrest and imprisonment arose -on February 3, 1972, when she was released from confinement (Caminito v. City of New York, 25 A D 2d 848, affd. 19 N Y 2d 931; Schildhaus v. City of New York, 23 AD 2d 409, affd. 17 N Y 2d 853; Allee v. City of New York, 42 A D 2d 899). Accordingly, service of her notice of claim, which Was required within 90 days of accrual of the cause of action (Public Authorities Law, § 1276, subd. 2; General Municipal Law,
§ 50-e, subd. 1), was due no later than May 3, 1972. It is undisputed that the notice herein, which was sent by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Quintero v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Schildhaus v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. v. Manikas, New York County Courts1958
- Desroches v. CaronNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hines v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Noonan v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Hammond v. City of PatersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Wenthen v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Stampf v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.