Wilson v. Southern Pacific Land Co.

This appeal is from the judgment rendered at the second trial of the action. At the- first trial the court granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit. The judgment was reversed on appeal. (46 Cal. App. 738 [189 Pac. 1040].) In the opinion of the appellate court the issues and the law applicable thereto are stated. Appel lant’s principal contention is that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and it is sufficient herein to examine the evidence produced at the second trial..

Plaintiff testified that H. C. Farnum purchased the lands in controversy for plaintiff in January, 1914;…