Legal Opinion

Aycock v. Carr

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1930No. Docket No. 4074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiffs had judgment in an action to cancel and set aside a certain deed of conveyance whereby a tract of land described in the complaint, valued at $14,000, was conveyed to the defendants, Edward A. Carr and Louisa F. Carr, in consideration of the assignment by said defendants to the plaintiffs of certain state rights under a pending application for patent. The lands described in the complaint were, by the defendants Carr, conveyed to the defendant Laura E. Rice, the defendant Laura E. Rice not having paid any consideration and having knowledge of the transactions involved in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newell-Murdoch Realty Co. v. WickhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wilson v. Southern Pacific Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dunn v. StringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API