Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 1999No. 98-1088PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) appeals from a Final Judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, awarding John and Dorothy Dixon (“the Dixons”) uninsured motorist benefits, including non-economic damages. State Farm argues that it was reversible error to allow an award for non-economic damages where the insured did not first meet the threshold requirements of section 627.737(2)(a-d), Florida Statutes.

The Dixons collided with a vehicle driven by an uninsured motorist and sought benefits from State Farm, their uninsured motorist carrier. State Farm did not pay benefits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dauksis v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Pollard v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  2. STAKEM v. RandolphDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
  3. Sternberg v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API