State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Dixon
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) appeals from a Final Judgment, entered upon a jury verdict, awarding John and Dorothy Dixon (“the Dixons”) uninsured motorist benefits, including non-economic damages. State Farm argues that it was reversible error to allow an award for non-economic damages where the insured did not first meet the threshold requirements of section 627.737(2)(a-d), Florida Statutes.
The Dixons collided with a vehicle driven by an uninsured motorist and sought benefits from State Farm, their uninsured motorist carrier. State Farm did not pay benefits…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dauksis v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Pollard v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- STAKEM v. RandolphDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Sternberg v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005