Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Gomez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 6, 1992No. 91-1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPE, Judge.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals an adverse final judgment in favor of its insured, plaintiff Guido Gomez. We reverse.

Plaintiff was insured by State Farm under an automobile policy which included uninsured motorist coverage. Plaintiff’s automobile was struck by a motor vehicle owned and driven by Oliverio Antonio To-meu, a codefendant below. Tomeu carried personal injury protection (PIP) coverage but not liability coverage.

At trial of plaintiff’s uninsured motorist claim against State Farm, plaintiff successfully argued that under the State Farm policy he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newton v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. DauksisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dauksis v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. HassenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DixonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Kahle v. PrewittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CurryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API