Legal Opinion
Rohrer v. Rick
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1995No. C9-94-1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
529 N.W.2d 406 (1995)
Anthony ROHRER, et al., judgment creditors, Appellants,
v.
Timothy RICK, judgment debtor, Respondent, and
The Travelers Companies, garnishee, Respondent.
No. C9-94-1934.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
March 21, 1995.
Marshall H. Tanick, Catherine M. Klimek, Mansfield & Tanick, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.
Thomas R. Hughes, Hughes & Costello, St. Paul, for Timothy Rick.
Paul D. Peterson, Shawn M. Raiter, King & Hatch, P.A., St. Paul, for The Travelers Companies.
Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and PETERSON and MANSUR,[*] JJ.
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
After stipulating to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. Dziuk (In Re Dziuk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. HallawayDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008