Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bates v. Neva

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2013No. DA 13-0012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Laura Lee Neva (Neva) alleges that Appellee Jim Bates (Bates) violated Montana’s Human Rights Act (the Act) by halting necessary repairs to the commercial building she rented from him because she rebuffed his sexual advances. Section 49-2-304, MCA (the Public Accommodation Provision), makes it unlawful for a place of public accommodation to deny to a person its “services, goods, facilities, advantages, or privileges”because of a person’s sex. Section 49-2-305, MCA (the Real-Estate Transaction Provision), makes it unlawful for an owner, lessor, or manager of a ‘housing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bates v. NevaMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Gazelka v. St. Peter S HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Upton v. NolanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Montana Department of Transportation v. Montana Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Bates v. NevaMontana Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API