United States v. Bopp
District Court, N.D. California
Criminal prosecution by the United States against Franz Bopp, E. H. Von Schack, Wilhelm Von Brincken, J. F. Van Koolbergen, Margaret W. Cornell, Charles C. Crowley, and Louis J. Smith. On plea in abatement, motion to quash indictment, and demurrer to plea.
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
The defendants have presented a plea in abatement and a motion to quash the indictment herein for the various reasons in such pica and motion stated. The government has demurred to the plea. The only matters of importance, as it seems to me, that are set forth in either the motion or plea, are those which have to do with the sustaining of a demurrer to' a former indictment, and with the asserted lack of knowledge on the part of the grand jurors as to the contents of the present one.
[ 1 ] As to the former, it is urged that, a demurrer having been sus*178tained to a previous…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BoppDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- United States v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- United States v. MorseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- United States v. GoldmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
- Commonwealth v. Judge SmartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.