Legal Opinion

Kovac v. Crooked River Ranch Club & Maintenance Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 2003No. 96-CV-0060; A102661PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Jefferson County denied plaintiffs application for a permit to operate his real estate business out of his residence in a development called Crooked River Ranch. Alleging collusion between the county and the development’s homeowner association, plaintiff sued the association for “Combination in Restraint of Trade” and “Interference with Business Relationship.” The trial court granted the association’s motion for summary judgment and, in a supplemental judgment, awarded costs, disbursements, and attorney fees. On appeal, we affirm the judgment, vacate the supplemental judgment, and remand.

Becau…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Cascade Health v. PeacehealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Kovac v. Crooked River Ranch Club & Maintenance Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API