Legal Opinion

United States v. Eisom

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 5, 2009No. 08-1893PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Following the appellant’s guilty plea to a federal drug-trafficking charge, the district court calculated the guideline sentencing range (GSR) to include as relevant conduct amounts of drugs and cash independently seized by local authorities in connection with an unrelated criminal investigation. This single-issue sentencing appeal challenges the court’s relevant conduct determination. We conclude that the appellant waived any objection to that determination and, in all events, the determination was not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, we affirm the sentence imposed below.

T…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Mardisco Staples and Delwin BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Carrasco-De-JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Delgado-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Acosta-ColónCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. HarakalyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. TkhilaishviliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API