Legal Opinion

United States v. Mardisco Staples and Delwin Brown

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 2, 2000No. 99-1630, 99-1876PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KANNE, Circuit Judge.

Mardisco Staples and Delwin Brown challenge the calculation of the sentences for their convictions for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. Staples and Brown pleaded guilty to the one-count indictment and, based on their individual criminal histories, were sentenced to 150 months and 292 months in prison, respectively. They contend that the district court erred in applying the United States Sentencing Guidelines, resulting in longer terms in prison than their criminal histories merited. The district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines was reasonable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. Steven C. Griffin, Marvin M. Rux, and Andrae ScurlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Bruce Loren LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Donald E. McClanahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. United States v. Rene Jaimes-JaimesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Brian W. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Thomas C. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API