Legal Opinion

Fox v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1973No. 19609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

Four plaintiffs have sued the City of Columbia for injuries growing out of an automobile collision at a street intersection. The city demurred to the complaints on the grounds that they did not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that they did no.t set forth a defect in the street, or a defect or mismanagement of anything under control of the city, used in the maintenance and repair of streets for the purpose of travel within the meaning of South Carolina Code of Laws, § 47-70 (1962).

The order of the lower court disposed of the four demurrers with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stanley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Stephen v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Fretwell v. ChaffinTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kiel v. DeSmet TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gazoo v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API