Legal Opinion

Stanley v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 16, 1967No. 18621PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice.

This action was brought against the State Highway Department to recover damages sustained in an intersectional automobile collision which allegedly resulted from the obstruction of plaintiff’s view at the intersection by underbrush which the Highway Department permitted to grow on the untraveled portion of its right of way. The sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action against the Highway Department, based upon such obstruction of view, was challenged by demurrer which the lower court sustained, and plaintiff has appealed.

The basic question for decision is whether…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inabinett v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Bunton v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Burnett v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  4. Fann v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Taylor v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  3. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Zupancic v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Reed v. MedlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API