Legal Opinion
Gelber v. Cappeller
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1958No. Civ. 22629PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
By their amended complaint in this action appellants sought to specifically enforce a contract for the sale to them by respondents of certain real property or in the alternative to recover damages for the breach of that contract. From a judgment denying either specific performance or damages they appeal.
By their amended complaint the appellants, Harold Gelber and Elsie Q. Gelber, alleged that the respondents, Nellie M. Cappeller, and William S. Cappeller* 1 as trustee under a testamentary trust, were the owners of the subject real property and that on or about the 25th of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Thoroman v. DavidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wood Building Corp. v. GriffittsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Apostolic Tabernacle Church of Titusville v. Florida State Council of the Pentecostal AssembliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998