Legal Opinion

Humphreys Tunnel & Mining Co. v. Frank

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 1, 1909No. 5757PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Costilla District Court — Hon. Charles C. Holbrook, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

In 1896 the plaintiff made an entry under the homestead laws of the United States upon 168 acres of land in Mineral county, patent title to which he afterwards obtained and still holds. Willow creek, a natural stream, flows through it. About sixty acres of it are natural meadow lands, lying upon either side of the stream, which, without artificial irrigation, yearly produce crops of hay as the result of the annual overflow of the waters of the stream. The remaining agricultural part of the tract is irrigated by water taken out of the stream through plaintiff’s ditch, to which a decreed…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Vidler Tunnel Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Reprigerator Transit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Mack v. Town of CraigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API