Legal Opinion

E. H. Emery & Co. v. American Reprigerator Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1921PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — D. M. Anderson, Judge. Action at law,, to. recover damages claimed to have been sustained in the shipment of 19 carloads of peaches. Judgment was rendered in behalf of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. The garnishee also appeals, and the plaintiff files a cross-appeal, conditioned on a reversal on defendants’ appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

„ „ aPagent11?™1^ third. parties. — The appellee is a copartnership, engaged in conducting a wholesale fruit business in the city of Ottumwa. The appellant is a corporation engaged in owning and operating certain refrigerator cars, which said cars are transported on various lines of railway throughout country. The Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company is a corporation operating a line of railway in the state of Texas and other states.

In the year 1912, the appellee entered into a contract with one Gideumb, a fruit grower at Chatterton, Texas, to purchase from the said Gideumb his entire…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Harriman v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Baird v. ShipmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bego v. GordonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Haupt v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Montanick Ex Rel. Montanick v. McMillinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  4. Herzog v. MittlemanOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Tennessee Chemical Co. v. CheathamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API