Legal Opinion

Mack v. Town of Craig

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1920No. 9491PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Moffat District Court, Hon. John T. Shumate, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff in error brings the cause here to review a judgment of the District Court of Moffat County whereby certain of his land was awarded the town of Craig in condemnation proceedings, as an outlet for its sewage into the Yampa or Bear river. It was and is the purpose of the town to empty its raw and unpurified sewage into that stream, at a point bounded on both sides by lands of the plaintiff, and to carry it for a distance of about a mile through his property, which he uses mainly for dairy busi ness. Numerous errors have been assigned, but for the purposes of this idecision it will be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winchell v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Farwell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Wise v. Yazoo CityMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Allen v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Potashnik v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  2. Public Service Co. v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Department of Transportation v. StapletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Fishel v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  5. Beth Medrosh Hagodol v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API