Sickles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald S. Taylor, J.
The motion by the defendant to dismiss for legal insufficiency the amended complaint which unites the infant’s cause of action for personal injuries with her parent’s derivative action is denied. According the pleading the benefit of fair inference and reasonable intendment it may be construed to allege that through a sale to his parent the defendant negligently put in the possession of an immature infant for his use an air gun and ammunition therefor who it knew or should have known because of his youth and his inexperience in handling such would be likely to employ in a manner involving…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Golembe v. BlumbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Henningsen v. MarkoWitzNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Gerbino v. Greenhut-Siegel-Cooper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by7 opinions
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Splawnik v. Di CaprioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Earsing v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Morris v. Toy BoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. NiekePort Jervis City Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.