Foster v. Bloomberg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
Defendant, Arthur Bloomberg, appeals pro se from a writ of possession issued by the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Bradford, J.) on a judgment entered in the District Court (Bridgton, Donovan, J.), in a forcible entry and detainer (FED) action. Finding no defect in the service of process, we dismiss the appeal for mootness because defendant has vacated the premises.
Plaintiff, Kermit G. Foster, Jr., brought an FED complaint against defendant in October of 1993. Defendant had last paid rent in February of 1992 for premises he rented from plaintiff. Defendant was served…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Tozier v. TozierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- In Re FaucherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Jones v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Rairdon v. DwyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Halfway House, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Halfway House, Inc. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999