Deyo v. Hammond
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Erazer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
'On January 25, 1888, the plaintiff, who resides at Jackson, this State, sold his mare, the “ Shelby Maid,” to defendant. The contract was made in Jackson, and the bargain, as claimed by the plaintiff, was that, after Hammond had driven the mare, he offered to give plaintiff his check for $800, and a further sum of $100 if she could go as fast as his (defendant’s) mare; that Mr. Moran was to drive them, and make the test, when he had been notified by defendant that he was ready, which test was to be made within 90 days. The plaintiff further testified that Mr. Moran was to decide if…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Potter v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Carolina Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. WeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Wolbarsht v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- James Leffel & Co. v. PiattMichigan Supreme Court · 1901