Legal Opinion
United States v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 13, 1978No. CIV-76-0672-DPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
This action was brought by the Plaintiff United States of America against Defendant St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company to recover civil penalties under the Hours of Service Act (Act), 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64b. Plaintiff-intervenor, United Transportation Union, seeks a declaratory judgment that the acts referred to in Plaintiff’s Complaint are in violation of the Act. It is asserted that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1337, 1345 and 1355, and 45 U.S.C. § 64a.
Defendant has filed herein a Motion for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,425 Biruta Dzenits v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and James A. BillingtonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Little Redhouse, Brady Tah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Quality Ford Sales, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Thomas E. ReddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Williams Petroleum Company, a Partnership Composed of William H. Clement and H. C. Preston, Jr. v. Midland Cooperatives, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.