Legal Opinion
O'Brien v. Coburn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 9, 1997No. AC 16663PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant, Derek John Cobum, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, Terrance J. O’Brien and Mary Ann O’Brien, in this action for an easement. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) permitted the plaintiffs to amend their complaint, (2) denied his application for attorney’s fees, (3) denied the recusal motion that was made during the course of trial, (4) refused to reread testimony during his cross-examination of a witness, and (5) admitted hearsay testimony under General Statutes § 52-172, the dead man’s statute. We…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Seattle Lake Shore & Eastern Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Norse Systems, Inc. v. Tingley Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. BarnettConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Kalas v. CookConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Merchant v. State Ethics CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Pender v. MatrangaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.