Legal Opinion

Atkin v. Marko

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 8, 2004No. AC 23776PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

In this personal injury action, the plaintiff, Elizabeth Atkin, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered following a hearing in damages. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly charged the jury on the issue of calculating future medical expenses. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the plaintiffs appeal. On May 8, 1999, a motor vehicle driven by the plaintiff was struck by a motor vehicle operated by the defendant Andrew Marko and owned by the defendant Leslie…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Matthiessen v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Scanlon v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Marchetti v. RamirezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Opotzner v. BassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FauntleroyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. State v. TokConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Shea v. DohertyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API