Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Hartford Life Insurance Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 21, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02201Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LORETTA BRUCE, No. 2:17-cv-02201-MCE-KJN 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 13 HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, 14 Defendant. 15 16 In this action, Plaintiff Loretta Bruce (“Plaintiff”) seeks redress under various 17 California laws from Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company 18 (“Defendant”) arising from Defendant’s termination of Plaintiff’s long-term disability 19 (“LTD”) benefits.1 Presently before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary 20 Adjudication and Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
  4. Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API