Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Philadelphia

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 2003PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The City of Philadelphia (City) and police officers Kilmaro 1 (Kuhlmeier), Romano (Romano) and John Does 1, 2, 3 and 4 (collectively, officers) 2 appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that denied their post-trial motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (judgment n.o.v.), new trial and remittitur in a civil action where a jury awarded compensatory and punitive damages to John Moore (Moore). 3 Moore cross-appeals the trial jeourt’s denial of his request for delay damages. We affirm the trial court’s decision as to denial of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kuzel v. KrauseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Hall v. KigerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Royer Garden Center & Greenhouse, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. In Re: Mountaintop Area Joint Sanitary Authority C. DeLuca v. Mountaintop Area Joint Sanitary AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Marker v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API