Legal Opinion

Gulf, Mobile & N. R.R. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided February 20, 1931No. Docket Nos. 24887, 35898, 38295, 42149, 42150PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*244OPINION.

Trammell:

Several assignments of error have been admitted by the respondent, necessitating adjustments in the net incomes determined in the deficiency notices, as follows:

Docket No. 24887.

Net income for 1920 should be reduced (1) by $7,918.02 on account of “ so-called ‘ donations ’ ”; (2) by $150,196.34, on account of “ depreciation on equipment sustained during the Federal control period and charged to the Director General of Railroads, but which was not allowed by him in the final settlement in 1920; (3) by $82,187.99, on account of “ overmaintenance charged to petitioner in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. HowbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
  3. Boston E. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  4. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommisssionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
  5. Baboquivari Cattle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API