Gulf, Mobile & N. R.R. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*244OPINION.
Trammell:
Several assignments of error have been admitted by the respondent, necessitating adjustments in the net incomes determined in the deficiency notices, as follows:
Docket No. 24887.
Net income for 1920 should be reduced (1) by $7,918.02 on account of “ so-called ‘ donations ’ ”; (2) by $150,196.34, on account of “ depreciation on equipment sustained during the Federal control period and charged to the Director General of Railroads, but which was not allowed by him in the final settlement in 1920; (3) by $82,187.99, on account of “ overmaintenance charged to petitioner in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. HowbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Southern Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Boston E. R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommisssionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- Baboquivari Cattle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.