State v. Agubata
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Among the errors argued, defendant asserts that the trial court erred when it refused to admit into evidence letters the defendant alleges were sent to him from another who purportedly confessed to owning the controlled substances found in defendant’s home. Defendant also alleges that because the most prevalent controlled substance in the powder was methaqualone, the proper charge was felony possession of methaqualone, not trafficking in heroin, and that he was entitled to a jury instruction on the lesser included offense of felonious possession of heroin. Finally, defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strickland v. DoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. RhomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. CarriganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.