Legal Opinion

United States v. Wray

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 9, 1984No. 45,067; NMCM 82 0840PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Judge.

The Judge Advocate General of the Navy certified the record of appellant’s general court-martial * for us to consider whether a variance between the date of the larceny in the charge laid and that proven in the members’ findings was a fatal variance in that it violated due process rights. 14 M.J. 447 (1982). We are persuaded by authority of the United States Supreme Court that such is the case. Dunn v. United States, 442 U.S. 100, 99 S.Ct. 2190, 60 L.Ed.2d 743 (1979). Under these particular facts, the change of date created a material and non-permissible…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Cole v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Garner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Eaton v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. TeffeauCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. FrazierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. AntonelliUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. HuntUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. MervineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API